GeraRent · Area head-to-head
Stoke-on-Trent vs Wolverhampton: which is the better place to live?
Is Stoke-on-Trent or Wolverhampton a better place to live?
As of June 2026, comparing Stoke-on-Trent and Wolverhampton across house prices, crime, schools, broadband and GP access, Stoke-on-Trent wins overall with a Gera Liveability Score of 84.5/100 versus 82.9/100. Gera computes this head-to-head from six UK government open datasets and re-runs it quarterly.
| Measure | Stoke-on-Trent | Wolverhampton | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gera Liveability Score | 84.5/100 | 82.9/100 | Stoke-on-Trent |
| Better value | 72.2 | 60.7 | Stoke-on-Trent |
| For families | 91.3 | 90.4 | Stoke-on-Trent |
| For commuters | 77.3 | 80.9 | Wolverhampton |
| For healthcare access | 94 | 100 | Wolverhampton |
| Avg house price | £152,101 | £215,264 | Stoke-on-Trent (cheaper) |
| Band D council tax | £2,183 | £2,539 | Stoke-on-Trent (lower) |
| Schools Good/Outstanding | 88.1% | 90% | Wolverhampton |
| Crime per 1,000 | 73.3 | 98.6 | Stoke-on-Trent (safer) |
| Gigabit broadband | 96.3% | 97.7% | Wolverhampton |
| Gera GP Access score | 94 | 100 | Wolverhampton |
Compare any two areas
Swap in any two of the 130 covered local authorities for a live head-to-head.
Compare any two areas
Pick two UK local authorities and Gera computes the head-to-head live from the joined government data.
Stoke-on-Trent wins overall: Gera Liveability Score 84.5/100 vs 82.9/100.
| Verdict | Stoke-on-Trent | Wolverhampton | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 84.5 | 82.9 | Stoke-on-Trent (+1.6) |
| Better value | 72.2 | 60.7 | Stoke-on-Trent (+11.5) |
| For families | 91.3 | 90.4 | Stoke-on-Trent (+0.9) |
| For commuters | 77.3 | 80.9 | Wolverhampton (+3.6) |
| For healthcare access | 94 | 100 | Wolverhampton (+6) |
| Measure | Stoke-on-Trent | Wolverhampton |
|---|---|---|
| Avg house price | £152,101 | £215,264 |
| Band D council tax | £2,183 | £2,539 |
| Schools Good/Outstanding | 88.1% | 90% |
| Crime per 1,000 | 73.3 | 98.6 |
| Gigabit broadband | 96.3% | 97.7% |
| Gera GP Access score | 94 | 100 |
Frequently asked questions
- Is Stoke-on-Trent or Wolverhampton a better place to live overall?
- Stoke-on-Trent scores higher overall: a Gera Liveability Score of 84.5/100 versus 82.9/100 (Gera, June 2026), a gap of 1.6 points.
- Which is cheaper to rent and buy, Stoke-on-Trent or Wolverhampton?
- On affordability — average house price plus Band D council tax — Stoke-on-Trent is better value. Average house prices are £152,101 in Stoke-on-Trent and £215,264 in Wolverhampton; Band D council tax is £2,183 versus £2,539 (HM Land Registry + MHCLG, June 2026).
- Is Stoke-on-Trent or Wolverhampton better for families?
- Weighting schools (60%) and safety (40%), Stoke-on-Trent comes out ahead for families. Stoke-on-Trent has 88.1% of schools rated Good or Outstanding and a crime rate of 73.3 per 1,000; Wolverhampton has 90% and 98.6 per 1,000 (Ofsted + Home Office, June 2026).
- Which has better broadband, Stoke-on-Trent or Wolverhampton?
- For connectivity, Stoke-on-Trent has 96.3% gigabit-capable premises and Wolverhampton has 97.7% (Ofcom, June 2026). Wolverhampton leads on the commuter blend of broadband (70%) and affordability (30%).
- Is GP access better in Stoke-on-Trent or Wolverhampton?
- On the Gera GP Access score, Stoke-on-Trent scores 94 (Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICB) and Wolverhampton scores 100 (Black Country ICB). Wolverhampton has the better GP access (NHS England, June 2026).
Renting in Stoke-on-Trent or Wolverhampton?
Browse verified GeraRent listings in either area and shortlist your next home.
Contains public sector information published by GeraRent and licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Gera Liveability Index — joined UK government open data (June 2026, published 2026-06-19).