Skip to main content

Gera Head-to-Head Verdict — methodology

The Gera Head-to-Head Verdict compares two UK local authorities on liveability and names the better area for several use-cases. It is a transparent computation over the Gera Liveability Score sub-scores — no figure is estimated or hand-entered.

The five sub-scores

Each area carries five sub-scores (0–100), each derived from a real government dataset and joined on the ONS local-authority code: affordability (house price + Band D council tax), safety (recorded crime), schools (Ofsted Good/Outstanding share), connectivity (Ofcom broadband) and healthcare (NHS GP appointment access). These are the same sub-scores published in the Gera Liveability Index.

The named verdicts and their weights

Each named verdict is a fixed, published blend of the sub-scores. The higher-scoring area wins that verdict; an exact tie is reported as level.

For families   = schools × 0.6 + safety × 0.4
For commuters  = connectivity × 0.7 + affordability × 0.3
Better value   = affordability sub-score
Healthcare     = GP-access sub-score
Overall        = the Gera Liveability Score (GLS)

Worked example

Comparing Stoke-on-Trent (GLS 84.5/100) and Southend on Sea (GLS 84.3/100), as of June 2026:

Data sources & cadence

Every figure comes from one of the following UK government open datasets, published under the Open Government Licence v3.0, and re-joined each time a source releases (the verdict is recomputed quarterly; current edition June 2026):

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Back to UK area vs area comparisons.