Skip to main content

GeraRent · Area head-to-head

Redbridge vs Waltham Forest: which is the better place to live?

Is Redbridge or Waltham Forest a better place to live?

As of June 2026, comparing Redbridge and Waltham Forest across house prices, crime, schools, broadband and GP access, Redbridge wins overall with a Gera Liveability Score of 69.1/100 versus 68.1/100. Gera computes this head-to-head from six UK government open datasets and re-runs it quarterly.

Source:Gera Liveability Index — joined UK government open data·as of June 2026updated quarterly (last: )
Gera Head-to-Head VerdictRedbridge 69.1 / 100Redbridge wins overall on the Gera Liveability Score.How this index is calculated
Redbridge vs Waltham Forest — side-by-side (as of June 2026)
MeasureRedbridgeWaltham ForestWinner
Gera Liveability Score69.1/10068.1/100Redbridge
Better value51.248Redbridge
For families92.891.4Redbridge
For commuters67.668.9Waltham Forest
For healthcare access3737Level
Avg house price£502,501£524,099Redbridge (cheaper)
Band D council tax£2,295£2,387Redbridge (lower)
Schools Good/Outstanding94.3%92%Redbridge
Crime per 1,000101.7101.7Level
Gigabit broadband92.3%93.9%Waltham Forest
Gera GP Access score3737Level

Compare any two areas

Swap in any two of the 130 covered local authorities for a live head-to-head.

Compare any two areas

Pick two UK local authorities and Gera computes the head-to-head live from the joined government data.

Redbridge wins overall: Gera Liveability Score 69.1/100 vs 68.1/100.

VerdictRedbridgeWaltham ForestWinner
Overall69.168.1Redbridge (+1)
Better value51.248Redbridge (+3.2)
For families92.891.4Redbridge (+1.4)
For commuters67.668.9Waltham Forest (+1.3)
For healthcare access3737Level
Underlying figures
MeasureRedbridgeWaltham Forest
Avg house price£502,501£524,099
Band D council tax£2,295£2,387
Schools Good/Outstanding94.3%92%
Crime per 1,000101.7101.7
Gigabit broadband92.3%93.9%
Gera GP Access score3737

Open the full Redbridge vs Waltham Forest page →

Frequently asked questions

Is Redbridge or Waltham Forest a better place to live overall?
Redbridge scores higher overall: a Gera Liveability Score of 69.1/100 versus 68.1/100 (Gera, June 2026), a gap of 1 points.
Which is cheaper to rent and buy, Redbridge or Waltham Forest?
On affordability — average house price plus Band D council tax — Redbridge is better value. Average house prices are £502,501 in Redbridge and £524,099 in Waltham Forest; Band D council tax is £2,295 versus £2,387 (HM Land Registry + MHCLG, June 2026).
Is Redbridge or Waltham Forest better for families?
Weighting schools (60%) and safety (40%), Redbridge comes out ahead for families. Redbridge has 94.3% of schools rated Good or Outstanding and a crime rate of 101.7 per 1,000; Waltham Forest has 92% and 101.7 per 1,000 (Ofsted + Home Office, June 2026).
Which has better broadband, Redbridge or Waltham Forest?
For connectivity, Redbridge has 92.3% gigabit-capable premises and Waltham Forest has 93.9% (Ofcom, June 2026). Waltham Forest leads on the commuter blend of broadband (70%) and affordability (30%).
Is GP access better in Redbridge or Waltham Forest?
On the Gera GP Access score, Redbridge scores 37 (North East London ICB) and Waltham Forest scores 37 (North East London ICB). The two are level for GP access (NHS England, June 2026).

Renting in Redbridge or Waltham Forest?

Browse verified GeraRent listings in either area and shortlist your next home.

Contains public sector information published by GeraRent and licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Gera Liveability Index — joined UK government open data (June 2026, published 2026-06-19).