Skip to main content

GeraRent · Area head-to-head

Croydon vs Kensington and Chelsea: which is the better place to live?

Is Croydon or Kensington and Chelsea a better place to live?

As of June 2026, comparing Croydon and Kensington and Chelsea across house prices, crime, schools, broadband and GP access, Kensington and Chelsea wins overall with a Gera Liveability Score of 64.2/100 versus 62.4/100. Gera computes this head-to-head from six UK government open datasets and re-runs it quarterly.

Source:Gera Liveability Index — joined UK government open data·as of June 2026updated quarterly (last: )
Gera Head-to-Head VerdictKensington and Chelsea 64.2 / 100Kensington and Chelsea wins overall on the Gera Liveability Score.How this index is calculated
Croydon vs Kensington and Chelsea — side-by-side (as of June 2026)
MeasureCroydonKensington and ChelseaWinner
Gera Liveability Score62.4/10064.2/100Kensington and Chelsea
Better value49.825.3Croydon
For families86.590.7Kensington and Chelsea
For commuters45.953.3Kensington and Chelsea
For healthcare access39.470Kensington and Chelsea
Avg house price£395,442£1,272,760Croydon (cheaper)
Band D council tax£2,600£1,667Kensington and Chelsea (lower)
Schools Good/Outstanding83.9%90.9%Kensington and Chelsea
Crime per 1,000101.7101.7Level
Gigabit broadband87.5%93.4%Kensington and Chelsea
Gera GP Access score39.470Kensington and Chelsea

Compare any two areas

Swap in any two of the 130 covered local authorities for a live head-to-head.

Compare any two areas

Pick two UK local authorities and Gera computes the head-to-head live from the joined government data.

Kensington and Chelsea wins overall: Gera Liveability Score 64.2/100 vs 62.4/100.

VerdictCroydonKensington and ChelseaWinner
Overall62.464.2Kensington and Chelsea (+1.8)
Better value49.825.3Croydon (+24.5)
For families86.590.7Kensington and Chelsea (+4.2)
For commuters45.953.3Kensington and Chelsea (+7.4)
For healthcare access39.470Kensington and Chelsea (+30.6)
Underlying figures
MeasureCroydonKensington and Chelsea
Avg house price£395,442£1,272,760
Band D council tax£2,600£1,667
Schools Good/Outstanding83.9%90.9%
Crime per 1,000101.7101.7
Gigabit broadband87.5%93.4%
Gera GP Access score39.470

Open the full Croydon vs Kensington and Chelsea page →

Frequently asked questions

Is Croydon or Kensington and Chelsea a better place to live overall?
Kensington and Chelsea scores higher overall: a Gera Liveability Score of 64.2/100 versus 62.4/100 (Gera, June 2026), a gap of 1.8 points.
Which is cheaper to rent and buy, Croydon or Kensington and Chelsea?
On affordability — average house price plus Band D council tax — Croydon is better value. Average house prices are £395,442 in Croydon and £1,272,760 in Kensington and Chelsea; Band D council tax is £2,600 versus £1,667 (HM Land Registry + MHCLG, June 2026).
Is Croydon or Kensington and Chelsea better for families?
Weighting schools (60%) and safety (40%), Kensington and Chelsea comes out ahead for families. Croydon has 83.9% of schools rated Good or Outstanding and a crime rate of 101.7 per 1,000; Kensington and Chelsea has 90.9% and 101.7 per 1,000 (Ofsted + Home Office, June 2026).
Which has better broadband, Croydon or Kensington and Chelsea?
For connectivity, Croydon has 87.5% gigabit-capable premises and Kensington and Chelsea has 93.4% (Ofcom, June 2026). Kensington and Chelsea leads on the commuter blend of broadband (70%) and affordability (30%).
Is GP access better in Croydon or Kensington and Chelsea?
On the Gera GP Access score, Croydon scores 39.4 (South West London ICB) and Kensington and Chelsea scores 70 (West and North London ICB). Kensington and Chelsea has the better GP access (NHS England, June 2026).

Renting in Croydon or Kensington and Chelsea?

Browse verified GeraRent listings in either area and shortlist your next home.

Contains public sector information published by GeraRent and licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Gera Liveability Index — joined UK government open data (June 2026, published 2026-06-19).