GeraRent · Area head-to-head
Kingston upon Hull vs Wolverhampton: which is the better place to live?
Is Kingston upon Hull or Wolverhampton a better place to live?
As of June 2026, comparing Kingston upon Hull and Wolverhampton across house prices, crime, schools, broadband and GP access, Wolverhampton wins overall with a Gera Liveability Score of 82.9/100 versus 81.4/100. Gera computes this head-to-head from six UK government open datasets and re-runs it quarterly.
| Measure | Kingston upon Hull | Wolverhampton | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gera Liveability Score | 81.4/100 | 82.9/100 | Wolverhampton |
| Better value | 70.5 | 60.7 | Kingston upon Hull |
| For families | 90.6 | 90.4 | Kingston upon Hull |
| For commuters | 91.2 | 80.9 | Kingston upon Hull |
| For healthcare access | 59.3 | 100 | Wolverhampton |
| Avg house price | £135,051 | £215,264 | Kingston upon Hull (cheaper) |
| Band D council tax | £2,295 | £2,539 | Kingston upon Hull (lower) |
| Schools Good/Outstanding | 90% | 90% | Level |
| Crime per 1,000 | 96.1 | 98.6 | Kingston upon Hull (safer) |
| Gigabit broadband | 99.4% | 97.7% | Kingston upon Hull |
| Gera GP Access score | 59.3 | 100 | Wolverhampton |
Compare any two areas
Swap in any two of the 130 covered local authorities for a live head-to-head.
Compare any two areas
Pick two UK local authorities and Gera computes the head-to-head live from the joined government data.
Wolverhampton wins overall: Gera Liveability Score 82.9/100 vs 81.4/100.
| Verdict | Kingston upon Hull | Wolverhampton | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 81.4 | 82.9 | Wolverhampton (+1.5) |
| Better value | 70.5 | 60.7 | Kingston upon Hull (+9.8) |
| For families | 90.6 | 90.4 | Kingston upon Hull (+0.2) |
| For commuters | 91.2 | 80.9 | Kingston upon Hull (+10.3) |
| For healthcare access | 59.3 | 100 | Wolverhampton (+40.7) |
| Measure | Kingston upon Hull | Wolverhampton |
|---|---|---|
| Avg house price | £135,051 | £215,264 |
| Band D council tax | £2,295 | £2,539 |
| Schools Good/Outstanding | 90% | 90% |
| Crime per 1,000 | 96.1 | 98.6 |
| Gigabit broadband | 99.4% | 97.7% |
| Gera GP Access score | 59.3 | 100 |
Frequently asked questions
- Is Kingston upon Hull or Wolverhampton a better place to live overall?
- Wolverhampton scores higher overall: a Gera Liveability Score of 82.9/100 versus 81.4/100 (Gera, June 2026), a gap of 1.5 points.
- Which is cheaper to rent and buy, Kingston upon Hull or Wolverhampton?
- On affordability — average house price plus Band D council tax — Kingston upon Hull is better value. Average house prices are £135,051 in Kingston upon Hull and £215,264 in Wolverhampton; Band D council tax is £2,295 versus £2,539 (HM Land Registry + MHCLG, June 2026).
- Is Kingston upon Hull or Wolverhampton better for families?
- Weighting schools (60%) and safety (40%), Kingston upon Hull comes out ahead for families. Kingston upon Hull has 90% of schools rated Good or Outstanding and a crime rate of 96.1 per 1,000; Wolverhampton has 90% and 98.6 per 1,000 (Ofsted + Home Office, June 2026).
- Which has better broadband, Kingston upon Hull or Wolverhampton?
- For connectivity, Kingston upon Hull has 99.4% gigabit-capable premises and Wolverhampton has 97.7% (Ofcom, June 2026). Kingston upon Hull leads on the commuter blend of broadband (70%) and affordability (30%).
- Is GP access better in Kingston upon Hull or Wolverhampton?
- On the Gera GP Access score, Kingston upon Hull scores 59.3 (Humber and North Yorkshire ICB) and Wolverhampton scores 100 (Black Country ICB). Wolverhampton has the better GP access (NHS England, June 2026).
Renting in Kingston upon Hull or Wolverhampton?
Browse verified GeraRent listings in either area and shortlist your next home.
Contains public sector information published by GeraRent and licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Gera Liveability Index — joined UK government open data (June 2026, published 2026-06-19).