GeraRent · Area head-to-head
Kingston upon Hull vs Walsall: which is the better place to live?
Is Kingston upon Hull or Walsall a better place to live?
As of June 2026, comparing Kingston upon Hull and Walsall across house prices, crime, schools, broadband and GP access, Kingston upon Hull wins overall with a Gera Liveability Score of 81.4/100 versus 78.2/100. Gera computes this head-to-head from six UK government open datasets and re-runs it quarterly.
| Measure | Kingston upon Hull | Walsall | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gera Liveability Score | 81.4/100 | 78.2/100 | Kingston upon Hull |
| Better value | 70.5 | 58.7 | Kingston upon Hull |
| For families | 90.6 | 88.3 | Kingston upon Hull |
| For commuters | 91.2 | 64.7 | Kingston upon Hull |
| For healthcare access | 59.3 | 100 | Walsall |
| Avg house price | £135,051 | £214,922 | Kingston upon Hull (cheaper) |
| Band D council tax | £2,295 | £2,627 | Kingston upon Hull (lower) |
| Schools Good/Outstanding | 90% | 86.4% | Kingston upon Hull |
| Crime per 1,000 | 96.1 | 98.6 | Kingston upon Hull (safer) |
| Gigabit broadband | 99.4% | 92.4% | Kingston upon Hull |
| Gera GP Access score | 59.3 | 100 | Walsall |
Compare any two areas
Swap in any two of the 130 covered local authorities for a live head-to-head.
Compare any two areas
Pick two UK local authorities and Gera computes the head-to-head live from the joined government data.
Kingston upon Hull wins overall: Gera Liveability Score 81.4/100 vs 78.2/100.
| Verdict | Kingston upon Hull | Walsall | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 81.4 | 78.2 | Kingston upon Hull (+3.2) |
| Better value | 70.5 | 58.7 | Kingston upon Hull (+11.8) |
| For families | 90.6 | 88.3 | Kingston upon Hull (+2.3) |
| For commuters | 91.2 | 64.7 | Kingston upon Hull (+26.5) |
| For healthcare access | 59.3 | 100 | Walsall (+40.7) |
| Measure | Kingston upon Hull | Walsall |
|---|---|---|
| Avg house price | £135,051 | £214,922 |
| Band D council tax | £2,295 | £2,627 |
| Schools Good/Outstanding | 90% | 86.4% |
| Crime per 1,000 | 96.1 | 98.6 |
| Gigabit broadband | 99.4% | 92.4% |
| Gera GP Access score | 59.3 | 100 |
Frequently asked questions
- Is Kingston upon Hull or Walsall a better place to live overall?
- Kingston upon Hull scores higher overall: a Gera Liveability Score of 81.4/100 versus 78.2/100 (Gera, June 2026), a gap of 3.2 points.
- Which is cheaper to rent and buy, Kingston upon Hull or Walsall?
- On affordability — average house price plus Band D council tax — Kingston upon Hull is better value. Average house prices are £135,051 in Kingston upon Hull and £214,922 in Walsall; Band D council tax is £2,295 versus £2,627 (HM Land Registry + MHCLG, June 2026).
- Is Kingston upon Hull or Walsall better for families?
- Weighting schools (60%) and safety (40%), Kingston upon Hull comes out ahead for families. Kingston upon Hull has 90% of schools rated Good or Outstanding and a crime rate of 96.1 per 1,000; Walsall has 86.4% and 98.6 per 1,000 (Ofsted + Home Office, June 2026).
- Which has better broadband, Kingston upon Hull or Walsall?
- For connectivity, Kingston upon Hull has 99.4% gigabit-capable premises and Walsall has 92.4% (Ofcom, June 2026). Kingston upon Hull leads on the commuter blend of broadband (70%) and affordability (30%).
- Is GP access better in Kingston upon Hull or Walsall?
- On the Gera GP Access score, Kingston upon Hull scores 59.3 (Humber and North Yorkshire ICB) and Walsall scores 100 (Black Country ICB). Walsall has the better GP access (NHS England, June 2026).
Renting in Kingston upon Hull or Walsall?
Browse verified GeraRent listings in either area and shortlist your next home.
Contains public sector information published by GeraRent and licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Gera Liveability Index — joined UK government open data (June 2026, published 2026-06-19).