GeraRent · Area head-to-head
Kingston upon Hull vs Stoke-on-Trent: which is the better place to live?
Is Kingston upon Hull or Stoke-on-Trent a better place to live?
As of June 2026, comparing Kingston upon Hull and Stoke-on-Trent across house prices, crime, schools, broadband and GP access, Stoke-on-Trent wins overall with a Gera Liveability Score of 84.5/100 versus 81.4/100. Gera computes this head-to-head from six UK government open datasets and re-runs it quarterly.
| Measure | Kingston upon Hull | Stoke-on-Trent | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gera Liveability Score | 81.4/100 | 84.5/100 | Stoke-on-Trent |
| Better value | 70.5 | 72.2 | Stoke-on-Trent |
| For families | 90.6 | 91.3 | Stoke-on-Trent |
| For commuters | 91.2 | 77.3 | Kingston upon Hull |
| For healthcare access | 59.3 | 94 | Stoke-on-Trent |
| Avg house price | £135,051 | £152,101 | Kingston upon Hull (cheaper) |
| Band D council tax | £2,295 | £2,183 | Stoke-on-Trent (lower) |
| Schools Good/Outstanding | 90% | 88.1% | Kingston upon Hull |
| Crime per 1,000 | 96.1 | 73.3 | Stoke-on-Trent (safer) |
| Gigabit broadband | 99.4% | 96.3% | Kingston upon Hull |
| Gera GP Access score | 59.3 | 94 | Stoke-on-Trent |
Compare any two areas
Swap in any two of the 130 covered local authorities for a live head-to-head.
Compare any two areas
Pick two UK local authorities and Gera computes the head-to-head live from the joined government data.
Stoke-on-Trent wins overall: Gera Liveability Score 84.5/100 vs 81.4/100.
| Verdict | Kingston upon Hull | Stoke-on-Trent | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 81.4 | 84.5 | Stoke-on-Trent (+3.1) |
| Better value | 70.5 | 72.2 | Stoke-on-Trent (+1.7) |
| For families | 90.6 | 91.3 | Stoke-on-Trent (+0.7) |
| For commuters | 91.2 | 77.3 | Kingston upon Hull (+13.9) |
| For healthcare access | 59.3 | 94 | Stoke-on-Trent (+34.7) |
| Measure | Kingston upon Hull | Stoke-on-Trent |
|---|---|---|
| Avg house price | £135,051 | £152,101 |
| Band D council tax | £2,295 | £2,183 |
| Schools Good/Outstanding | 90% | 88.1% |
| Crime per 1,000 | 96.1 | 73.3 |
| Gigabit broadband | 99.4% | 96.3% |
| Gera GP Access score | 59.3 | 94 |
Frequently asked questions
- Is Kingston upon Hull or Stoke-on-Trent a better place to live overall?
- Stoke-on-Trent scores higher overall: a Gera Liveability Score of 84.5/100 versus 81.4/100 (Gera, June 2026), a gap of 3.1 points.
- Which is cheaper to rent and buy, Kingston upon Hull or Stoke-on-Trent?
- On affordability — average house price plus Band D council tax — Stoke-on-Trent is better value. Average house prices are £135,051 in Kingston upon Hull and £152,101 in Stoke-on-Trent; Band D council tax is £2,295 versus £2,183 (HM Land Registry + MHCLG, June 2026).
- Is Kingston upon Hull or Stoke-on-Trent better for families?
- Weighting schools (60%) and safety (40%), Stoke-on-Trent comes out ahead for families. Kingston upon Hull has 90% of schools rated Good or Outstanding and a crime rate of 96.1 per 1,000; Stoke-on-Trent has 88.1% and 73.3 per 1,000 (Ofsted + Home Office, June 2026).
- Which has better broadband, Kingston upon Hull or Stoke-on-Trent?
- For connectivity, Kingston upon Hull has 99.4% gigabit-capable premises and Stoke-on-Trent has 96.3% (Ofcom, June 2026). Kingston upon Hull leads on the commuter blend of broadband (70%) and affordability (30%).
- Is GP access better in Kingston upon Hull or Stoke-on-Trent?
- On the Gera GP Access score, Kingston upon Hull scores 59.3 (Humber and North Yorkshire ICB) and Stoke-on-Trent scores 94 (Staffordshire and Stoke-on-Trent ICB). Stoke-on-Trent has the better GP access (NHS England, June 2026).
Renting in Kingston upon Hull or Stoke-on-Trent?
Browse verified GeraRent listings in either area and shortlist your next home.
Contains public sector information published by GeraRent and licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Source: Gera Liveability Index — joined UK government open data (June 2026, published 2026-06-19).